What matters
The shared price and cabin footprint strip away the usual trim trade-off: this is a powertrain decision between simpler electric use and the flexibility of a second energy system.
Key differences
- The BEV pairs a 74.9kWh battery with a 725km CLTC claim in its standard wheel configuration. With reliable home charging and predictable travel, it is the more direct fit for an electric routine.
- The EREV combines a 49.2kWh battery, 430km of CLTC electric range and 1,550km of combined CLTC range in its standard wheel configuration. It is the more flexible choice for frequent long trips or destinations with unreliable charging.
- The BEV avoids the EREV's fuel engine and related maintenance path, while the EREV can continue on fuel when charging is inconvenient. Choose between simpler electric use and a second energy system, not between cabin size or suggested price.
- Optional 20-inch wheels reduce the official range figures for both powertrains, so the delivered wheel choice changes the range reference used for planning.
Who it is for
- Choose the BEV if you have reliable home charging and most travel fits a predictable electric routine.
- Choose the EREV if frequent long trips or unreliable destination charging make fuel-backed continuation worth the added energy system.
- Choose neither until home parking, charging access, long-trip frequency and the exact wheel configuration are known.
Watch-outs
- CLTC figures are standardized claims, not guaranteed real-world range; weather, speed, load and energy use can change the result.
- The EREV adds fuel use and engine-service exposure, while the BEV can add home-charging installation and charging-time planning burdens.
- Verify the delivered wheel size before applying the model-badge range to your own planning.